2007/10/17
前几天才知道韩国有个星际选手叫Yellow,照片见相册(今天又加了一点新的^^)
不过我对这个人真是一无所知呢(除了知道他用的是zerg...),也没有看过他的比赛

注意到Yellow完全是因为他比较养眼

Yellow早期的照片都比较难看,特别是把头发染成蓝色的那几张……简直不能看|||
我都怀疑他是不是整容过

,希望没有
总的来说,我比较喜欢Yellow戴眼镜的几张照片:看起来秀气很多呢^^
(悄悄说:小叶子也是戴眼镜比较秀气呢)
P.S. 附上Yellow的简单资料,不过可能是N久以前的事情了吧
姓名:洪榛浩
ID:[NC]Yellow
种族:Zerg
出生日期:1982/10/31 (哟,过几天就生日了嘛)
身高:170cm (好矮|||)
体重:63kg
2007/10/9
从10月3日到今天,几乎天天都去篮球馆做志愿者。但是因为职位安排的关系,我几乎是成天都闲着的……
名义上,我的工作是编排组的翻译。可是编排组里成天出入的都是中国人,我根本没有事情可以做。
于是只能打打零工。这几天用得最多的就是:复印机、订书机、透明胶……简直是万能打杂
没有机会做翻译,还是蛮不爽的~
利用这几天在场管里的空闲时间,也算作了两件事:
1、扫雷。以前几乎没有扫过,今天顺利扫过了高级^^
2、看书。看了《基督山伯爵》和《茶花女》~
回寝室之后,就基本在和小叶子打星际啦~哈哈
2007/9/11
上次分手是在开学前一天
这次是开学第一天
真有规律~
我不是故意的……
2007/9/10
为什么很多人都觉得潘多拉是个不祥的名字呢?
“潘多拉”的意为:具有一切天赋的女人
多好的名字
P.S.至于那个盒子,为什么不问问“心不在焉”的厄庇米修斯呢?
2007/9/9
刚才不小心,错把google的地址打成:
www.googlr.com
发现居然还是能进到google的页面@@
想得真周到~
2007/9/6
| Test | Test Date | Reading | Listening | Speaking | Writing | Total |
| TELXML | August 17, 2007 | 30 | 29 | 24 | 27 | 110 |
考前复习了一个星期,考出这样的成绩也很满意了
觉得speaking部分有点低,但是除了一个bt到要求所有单项26+的学校,别的地方都够用了
考口语的时候,有一个部分光顾着看笔记,结果说的超时了……(从来没有摸考过的下场|||)
刚看了一下那部分是Fair,所以觉得没说完对分数的影响也不是太大吧
下面是ETS给各部分的评价:
| Reading Skills | Level | Your Performance |
| Reading | High(22-30) | Test takers who receive a score at the HIGH
level, as you did, typically understand academic texts in English that
require a wide range of reading abilities regardless of the difficulty
of the texts. Test takers who score at the HIGH level, typically - have a very good command of academic vocabulary and grammatical structure;
- can
understand and connect information, make appropriate inferences, and
synthesize ideas, even when the text is conceptually dense and the
language is complex;
- can recognize the expository organization
of a text and the role that specific information serves within the
larger text, even when the text is conceptually dense; and
- can abstract major ideas from a text, even when the text is conceptually dense and contains complex language.
|
| Listening Skills | Level | Your Performance |
| Listening | High(22-30) | Test takers who receive a score at the HIGH level,
as you did, typically understand conversations and lectures in English
that present a wide range of listening demands. These demands can
include difficult vocabulary (uncommon terms, or colloquial or
figurative language), complex grammatical structures, abstract or
complex ideas, and/or making sense of unexpected or seemingly
contradictory information. When listening to lectures and conversations like these, test takers at the HIGH level typically can - understand main ideas and important details, whether they are stated or implied;
- distinguish more important ideas from less important ones;
- understand how information is being used (for example, to provide evidence for a claim or describe a step in a complex process);
- recognize how pieces of information are connected (for example, in a cause-and-effect relationship);
- understand
many different ways that speakers use language for purposes other than
to give information (for example, to emphasize a point, express
agreement or disagreement, or convey intentions indirectly); and
- synthesize information, even when it is not presented in sequence, and make correct inferences on the basis of that information.
|
| Speaking Skills | Level | Your Performance |
| Speaking about familiar topics | Good(3.5 - 4.0) | Your
responses indicate an ability to communicate your personal experiences
and opinions effectively in English. Overall, your speech is clear and
fluent. Your use of vocabulary and grammar is effective with only minor
errors. Your ideas are generally well developed and expressed
coherently. |
| Speaking about campus situations | Fair(2.5 - 3.0) | Your
responses demonstrate an ability to speak in English about reading
material and experiences typically encountered by university students.
You are able to convey relevant information about conversations,
newspaper articles, and campus bulletins; however, some details are
missing or inaccurate. Limitations of grammar, vocabulary, and
pronunciation at times cause difficulty for the listener. However, they
do not seriously interfere with overall communication. |
| Speaking about academic course content | Fair(2.5 - 3.0) | Your
responses demonstrate that you are able to speak in English about
academic reading and lecture material, with only minor communication
problems. For the most part, your speech is clear and easy to
understand. However, some problems with pronunciation and intonation
may occasionally cause difficulty for the listener. Your use of grammar
and vocabulary is adequate to talk about the topics, but some ideas are
not fully developed or are inaccurate. |
| Writing Skills | Level | Your Performance |
| Writing based on reading and listening | Good(4.0 - 5.0) | You responded well to the task, relating the lecture to the reading. Weaknesses, if you have any, might have to do with - slight imprecision in your summary of some of the main points and/or
- use of English that is occasionally ungrammatical or unclear.
|
| Writing based on knowledge and experience | Good(4.0 - 5.0) | You responded with a well-organized and developed essay. Weaknesses, if you have any, might have to do with - use of English that is occasionally ungrammatical, unclear, or unidiomatic and/or
- elaboration of ideas or connection of ideas that could have been stronger.
|